🔗 Share this article Jennifer Lawrence Explains Why She Declined an Intimacy Coordinator on New Film Die My Love The acclaimed actress has become part of the growing list of performers who express doubts about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, explaining she chose not to use their services while working on her new movie Die My Love. Examining the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo era to guarantee the security and ease of actors during sequences involving partial undress and sexual content. However, several prominent actors including Jennifer Aniston and other established stars have expressed reservations about their presence, with several claiming they interfere with artistic process. Lawrence's On-Set Perspective In conversation on the Las Culturistas podcast, while promoting her new film where she plays a woman experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We did not have an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Robert." She continued: "Rob is not pervy and very committed to his partner. What we discussed mostly revolved around our children and relationships. There was absolutely no awkward tension or questions about personal boundaries." "Had there been the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have requested an on-set professional. Numerous male performers get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and subsequently the retaliation begins. He was completely different." Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate Earlier this week, entertainment database IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, together with multiple additional professional roles including choreography, catering, and puppetry. Previously, they were categorized as "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their specific credit. Despite this recognition, these professionals still encounter public discussion suggesting they might not be industry essential, with high-profile actors declining their participation. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier revealed she refused professional supervision while filming alongside her co-star on The Morning Show. Jennifer's Perspective "Jon was such a gentleman – I mean each action, every cut, 'You comfortable?'" she recalled. "The scenes were additionally carefully planned. That's the advantage of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare." She added, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're experienced professionals – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi present." Additional Cases and Professional Response Despite featuring multiple sequences of sexual activity and regular undress, Anora – the director's Oscar-winning project about a adult entertainer and a wealthy heir – filmed without an intimacy coordinator. Mikey Madison explained she and fellow actor her screen partner "decided it would be best to maintain privacy." "My character is a sex worker, and I had studied Sean's films and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as part of my job." Her comments provoked strong reactions from industry professionals, mirroring the reaction to another actress's recent comments, who recently revealed that working on her new movie her latest film marked her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "was unaware of previously." Paltrow's Perspective During filming about comfort level with a specific move alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, Paltrow responded: "I belong to the generation where you remove clothing, you assume position, the filming begins." Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then informed the professional: "We think we're good. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that." Professional Reaction After these statements, industry executive Caroline Hollick labeled them "concerning" and pointed out that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to command their own power and protection on film sets. "Occasionally an actor makes comments about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "The actress stated she grew up in a period when industry professionals 'removed clothing and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood performing alongside a man considerably junior than her, although likely he is comfortable, I considered it quite an irresponsible remark." Actor's Viewpoint The veteran actor, meanwhile, shared that he feels the main obligation during heterosexual sex scenes falls on the male performer, instead of a external professional. "Based on my career, you take responsibility as the man to ensure the female co-star is at ease, you discuss it thoroughly," he said. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance looks like."